Thursday, February 14, 2008

2/14/08: UCSB vs. Cal Poly

UCSB Gauchos (17-6, 6-4) vs. Cal Poly Mustangs (9-13, 4-6)
February 14, 2008, 7:00 p.m. (PST)

Note: This game was supposed to be on CSTV, but it doesn't appear to be on anymore.



After a disappointing loss to UCI on Saturday (and on TV, nonetheless), UCSB hopes to get back on track and beat the Mustangs for the second time this season.

As detailed yesterday (and in the link below), TGM looked over the Gauchos in conference games to test the theory that the Gauchos actually play to their opponents' pace. The results are below if you want to view them, but the simple answer is a resounding yes. Therefore, in tonight's match-up, look for the pace to be in the mid-60's, since Cal Poly is a middle-of-the-road pace team.

http://thegauchomanifesto.blogspot.com/2008/02/chameleons-or-gauchos.html

Shooting Percentage

UCSB: 45.6%
Cal Poly: 40.7%

Free Throws

UCSB: 317-406, 78.1%
Cal Poly: 275-419, 65.6%

Offensive Rebounding

UCSB: 9.2
Cal Poly: 9.7

Turnovers

UCSB: 15/game; opponents 18.1/game
Cal Poly: 13/game; opponents 15.7/game

If you recall the last game against Cal Poly, Bob Williams seemed to imply that his team was focused on not getting beat by the Mustangs' three point ability. The problem, the Mustangs were shooting a very poor percentage at that point in the season. Tonight, the Mustangs three point shooting ability is a measly 29.7%. They shoot the three more than UCSB and make it less than UCSB.

If I was Bob (which I'm not), I would encourage them to shoot the three tonight. They haven't proved that they can make the three point shot. Pack it in and let them shoot. If you don't believe me, look at the chart below. They're miserable at the three.



As for the other aspects of the game, the Gauchos defense has been decent of late. As for offense, they need to improve their off-the-ball movement. If they stand around and let players take their defenders one-on-one, they're going to be in for another tough game.

One more thing. The Gauchos need to try and impose their tempo on the game. Push the ball up the court. Shoot the three. Drive to the basket. Get to the free throw line. A good example of team following this strategy to a tee last night was Memphis. They got to the free throw line some 25+ times, as compared to Houston's less than 10 attempts. Memphis won by 8, I believe, so those free throws really help out.

Go Gauchos.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Model of Success

While watching the UCSB-UCI game Saturday night, I was thinking about the successful models the Gaucho hoops team (Men) could follow to ensure a successful program for years to come. I don't know why I hadn't thought of this before, but the exact model that needs to be replicated is the Lady Gauchos. Kudos to the announcer for popping this seemingly obvious thought into my head.

If Bob Williams needs any ideas on how to run a successful program, he need go no further than down the hall to talk to the man with the plan (below), Mark French.



Under French, the Lady Gauchos have been to the NCAA Tournament 11 times since the 1991-1992 season. Under Bob Williams, the Men's team has been to the NCAA Tournament once in his 10 years as head coach.

If Bob comes out lacking ideas from his meeting with Coach French, he needs to go to the other successful coach in the building, Tim Vom Steeg, the Men's soccer coach. TVS has led the soccer team to multiple NCAA Tournaments since 2002, including a National Championship in 2006.



There you have it Bob. Two coaches with a track record of success. All you have to do is borrow their formula, copy and see the results pay off.

One more thing that is pretty impressive. The Indianapolis Star put together a database of NCAA reporting schools finances for each athletic department. It's from the school year 2004-2005. Here is the link:

http://www2.indystar.com/NCAA_financial_reports/

The only sortable sports are football and basketball, so we can't use soccer from the report. However, during the year on those forms, the Lady Gauchos sold $136,478 worth of tickets as compared to the Men's $62,713. That is damn impressive! Say what you want, but, in reality Men's Basketball has always been more popular than Women's Basketball at most schools. That's just the nature of the beast, regardless, Coach French and his ladies managed to double up the Men's team.

Also impressive is the fact that the Women receive less monetary support from the University than the men. In the end, the Men out-revenued the Women. However, this is mainly a result of the fact that the Men have a sports camp that puts money into their revenue stream while the women have no such thing under their revenue.

The last figure that really stands out to me is the promotion expense. The men's team had about $4,500 to work with, while the women had a little more than $20,000. I don't know about the budgetary workings of the athletic department, but it seems that Coach French has this down right. All in all, the women's team has put up some impressive numbers, both financially and record-wise. I hope one day that the Men's team will suck up to the Women and learn how to right this ship, otherwise, history is doomed to repeat itself.

Chameleons or Gauchos?

As promised yesterday, TGM is going to rip off a couple posts today in honor of Wednesday. Over the last couple weeks, TGM has noticed a trend that the Gauchos play to the pace of their opponents. I'm going to toot the TGM horn a little bit and point out that no one (that I've heard of) has made this observation. It's a first.

We've analyzed the Big West Conference numbers (from kenpom.com) to see how pace is played by each team. We've compared the Gauchos to the rest of the Big West in an effort to see if they really mirror their opponent's style.

Average Pace/Game (ranked by pace, highest to lowest): All games are 10 games, unless noted

CSUN 72.7
CSUF 71.4 (11 games)
Pacific 65.4
LBSU 65.1 (11 games)
Cal Poly 64.9
UCSB 64.7
Davis 63.3
UCR 63 (9 games)
Irvine 62.3

Next, we took UCSB's game-by-game conference performance to see how they stacked up pace-wise. In parenthesis is the average pace that their opponent likes to play (from above).

1. LBSU 68 (65.1)
2. CSUN 78 (72.7)
3. Irvine 60 (62.3)
4. CSUF 73 (71.4)
5. Cal Poly 67 (64.9)
6. Pacific 63 (65.4)
7. Davis 53 (63.3)
8. UCR 60 (63)
9. CSUF 67 (71.4)
10. Irvine 58 (62.3)

The problem with the pace numbers is that 7 of the 9 teams are very close. As a result, we can't say with certainty that UCSB is deviating from their average pace and playing that style imposed by their opponent. Obviously, when the season is over, we'll have a much better comparison because we can compare the pace from the first game to the pace of the second game.

You'll have to take my word for it because I'm going to go through and post the numbers on here, but UCSB has the widest deviations of pace than any other team in the Big West.

What I did do, was go through each team and count out how many games they've played according close to pace. Again, the problem with this stat is that the numbers probably aren't going to vary widely because 7 of the 9 teams play a very similar pace. However, this should give us an accurate reflection.

CSUN (72.7): 8 of their 10 games have been played at a pace of 71 or higher. Clearly, they want to run and get as many possessions as possible. In their only two "below" games, UCR (65) and Pacific (66), they were still able to push them over their conference pace average. Clearly, the Matadors impose their style of play on their opponent more so than any other team in the Big West. Consequently, that's probably why they're tied for first.

CSUF (71.4 (11 games)): 6 of their 11 games were above 70. Their other 5 games, interestingly, have all been played at a pace of 67, which is still pretty close to the pace they want to play. They've still managed to make each opponent play above their normal pace which means they're imposing their style on the other team.

Pacific (65.4): They've played two games at a pace above 70 and you can guess who those two games were against. However, they've played no game at a pace in the 50s. All their games have been played in a range of 60-68.

LBSU (65.1 (11 games)): Two of their games have been above 70, do you know who they were against? CSUN and CSUF. Again, no games in the 50s, all in the 60s.

Cal Poly (64.9): They've played one game in the 70s against Northridge. Rest of their games have all been in the 60s.

UCSB (64.7): Two games have been in the 70s against CSUN and CSUF. They've had two games in the 50s against Davis and Irvine (Who, arguably, would be playing a much slower pace if they could (or had the personnel to)). Davis and Irvine are two of the three slowest teams in the Conference. The remaining 6 games have been in the 60s. They played Riverside, the third of the three slowest teams, at 60. The faster the team plays on this list, the faster UCSB has played. The Pacific game is the anomaly on the list with a pace of 63.

Davis (63.3): Two games in the 70s. Two games in the 50s. The rest of their games in the 60s. However, Davis has played a pace in those games of 61, 62, 60, 64 and 62. Looks like Davis is trying to walk the ball up the court, which is pretty much what they do.

UCR (63 (9 games)): One game in the 70s against CSUF. Two games in the 50s against Davis and Irvine. The rest of their games in the 60s come in at 62, 65, 61, 67, 60, 62. These guys just want to play slow as well.

Irvine (62.3): Two games in the 70s against CSUN and CSUF. Two games in the 50s. Rest of their 60 games are 60, 66, 62, 60, 60, 60. Looks like these guys have an aversion to playing fast.

NOW, FOR THE GRAND CONCLUSION!!!!

As you can see, the numbers aren't as clear cut. However, one trend emerges. UCSB plays the pace of their opponents. Their two fastest games have come against the two fastest opponents in the league. The Gauchos have played the three slowest teams, UCR, UCI and UCD, four times thus far, and they've played their 4 slowest games of the season (60, 53, 60 and 58). Obviously, the numbers confirm the fact that UCSB takes on the tempo of their opponent. Ultimately, this is not a good thing because UCSB can't take advantage of their biggest strengths on a consistent basis.

Maybe Bob Williams will read this and do something about it. Chances are, he won't.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

UCSB Drops to #20 in Mid-Major Top 25


After a week that saw the Gauchos lose to UCI for the second straight time this season, UCSB dropped like a stone from #13 in the MM25 to #20. Pacific made a nice leap from #23 to #16 and CSUN dropped from #17 to #18.

In all honesty, I don't even know why I post the Mid-Major Top 25 because it is a fairly ridiculous poll that makes little sense. As Exhibit A, I point to Gonzaga. The 'Zags, no doubt, are good. However, up until last week, they were ranked #1, while Butler was ranked #2. Does that make any sense to you? How is a team in the AP Top 25 ranked below a team in the ORV category of the Top 25? Seriously, who knows?

Exhibit B is CSUN and CSUF. Their records aren't superior by any means, however, CSUF hasn't even received a vote in this poll. Secondly, CSUN, despite being first or tied for first during the entire Big West Conference play has never been ranked as the highest Big West team.

Maybe these coaches know what they're doing, but I seriously question the wisdom of any poll after looking at Exhibit A.

Anyway, check back tomorrow because TGM is looking to do a double post tomorrow. Some more observations from this past week's shitstorm and some, hopefully, insightful analysis.

Monday, February 11, 2008

Sign This Guy Up!

While reading the Daily Nexus today, I learned that UCSB has a Guiness World Record Holder in their student population.

His record? He made 25 three pointers in one minute.

His name? Dan Loriaux. By the way, here's the link to the Nexus.

http://www.dailynexus.com/article.php?a=15780

It's not like the Gauchos need another three point shooter, but I say sign him up. Now is the time for a good analogy. I'm a San Francisco Giants fan. This off-season, the Giants had lots of needs. Center Fielder was not one of them. However, Brian Sabean felt that adding a 6th Center Fielder to the Giants would make our team superior. I think that the Gauchos should really contemplate adding Dan to the squad.

At least if we signed Dan up, we could be the #1 team in the country at something. That #1, ladies and gents, would be three point shooting.

Bob, at least give the man a shot.

The Wisdom of Terrell Owens

As I said on one of my most recent entries, Coach Williams gave me plenty of fodder for my upcoming columns. This idea comes courtesy of Terrell Owens.

Once upon a time, Terrell Owens was asked if Jeff Garcia was gay. His response was, "Like my boy tells me: If it looks like a rat and smells like a rat, by golly, it is a rat." Of course, Jeff Garcia is not gay. For proof, all one needs to do is look at this picture:



Wow. Jeff Garcia is living proof that hard work pays off in more than one way.

Getting back to my point. What does TO's quote have to do with Bob Williams? Quite simple, actually. For the last 10 seasons, Bob has coached the Gauchos to mediocre season after mediocre season. Yet, us Gaucho fans are eternal optimists. We want to believe that Bob will change his ways, put out a winning squad and churn out NCAA berth after NCAA berth.

The problem with this viewpoint is just what I said. Bob has had 10 years to prove himself and he's confirmed over and over again that he is a mediocre coach. There's not many jobs in America (that I can think of) where 10 years of mediocre performance gets you a contract extension and job security. However, I want you to repeat the Terrell Owens mantra (if you believe that Bob is still the answer), "If it looks like a rat and smells like a rat, by golly, it is a rat."

For those of you unconvinced by my verbal reasoning, let me try a numerical reasoning. Below is Bob's record at UCSB over his career.

Current 17-6
2006-2007 18-11
2005-2006 15-14
2004-2005 11-18
2003-2004 16-12
2002-2003 18-14
2001-2002 20-11
2000-2001 13-15
1999-2000 14-14
1998-1999 15-13

Averaged out, Bob "averages" a 15.7 win season and 12.8 losses per season. We'll be generous and round up. Bob goes for 16-13, on average, every season. If .500 is the definition of mediocre, I'd say he's been pretty mediocre.

For those of you who like charts, there is a chart below, courtesy of statsheet.com.



So, what's been the point of this discussion? The point is that Bob Williams isn't going to change or have some career revolution at this point. If anything, he's shown us that he's basically a career .500 coach. Of course, there are going to be anomaly's once in a while when Bob is fortunate enough to feast on an easy schedule.

For those of you who still believe in Bob, more power to you. I still root for the Gauchos, but I know with Bob at the helm, we're destined to make the NIT once every five years. For a superior academic institution, we should not accept mediocrity. After all, we don't accept mediocre students, so why keep a mediocre coach around? Unfortunately, we have to live in misery for two more seasons, then hope that our new AD (whomever he or she may be) will have a set of balls to send Bob packin'. Until then, I hope the Gauchos can get the next two NCAA berths (this season and next). In the meantime, I'm going to start looking for available coaching candidates. Is Ben Howland available?

Sunday, February 10, 2008

UCSB vs. Irvine Recap

Wow. Where do I start? In the interest of keeping this short (and because Bob gave me so many good ideas last night), I'm going to summarize our performance in each half with one word each: decent, WTF?.

For anyone who played Mortal Kombat as a kid and watched the game last night, I think you'll have a pretty good idea what I'm trying to convey if you watch the first 10 seconds of the clip.



For those of you who didn't watch the game, UCSB lost 65-59 last night to the Anteaters. Here are the four ordinary statistical categories that we normally focus on.

Shooting Percentage - UCSB: 40.4%; UCI: 47.7%

Free Throws - UCSB: 9-11, 81.8%; UCI: 17-22, 77.3%

Offensive Rebounding - UCSB: 10; UCI: 9

Turnovers - UCSB: 12; UCI: 13

Clearly, this battle was lost on both the free throw line and our abysmal second half shooting performance. UCI made us pay when we sent them to line. It didn't hurt that they shot lights out in the second half from two point land. UCSB was ice cold in the second half. They shot 17 three pointers in the second half and made four.

Al Harris and James Powell showed a shooter's mentality out there by firing up the three. I have no problem with that. I'm of the opinion that our three point shooting is so good (In fact, top 5 in that nation before last night's game) that we should keep firing up shots. However, I'm also of the belief that at some point you gotta be smart enough to realize that if your shot isn't falling, you have to go for the easier baskets.

Of course, this is where it gets tricky and I get a bit smarmy. I'm convinced that UCSB does not have an offense. I'm completely serious. Show me a playbook and I'll show a tape where no one moves around on offense and everyone tries to take their man one-on-one. This is part of the reason why we shot so many threes last night. When no one sets a pick for anyone else, you have to dribble around the perimeter. Since we're playing D-1, we've got a shot clock and we kept shooting silly three pointers.

The flip side of this is even more ridiculous. This team is one of the best free throw shooting teams in the nation, yet we got to the line 11 times. 11 TIMES!!! Does Bob or anyone on this team understand that they should drive to the basket, pump fake, get a foul, get to line and get in the bonus early? I know, it's complicated stuff. Lucky for me, I've got a degree from UCSB so I can put two plus two together. If I was coaching this team, there would be two shots they would be allowed to take: a lay-up in which they must pump fake at least once or a three pointer. You have to know your strengths and it seems ridiculous that after 20+ games, Bob still can't figure out what his teams strengths are.

Getting back to our lack of offense. It pisses me off when I see three or four of our players standing around for 25 seconds before moving around. If you don't believe me, watch the off ball players next game and you'll be amazed at the lack of movement.

One more gripe I have is with Nedim Pajevic. Nedim, I'm sure you're a great guy, and we'd probably get along if we ever drank beers together. However, I have some constructive criticism for you. You try to do much more than you're capable of. You played 17 minutes last night and the boxscore attribute two turnovers to you. Unfortunately, I was keeping track and you were directly responsible for 5. You averaged a turnover every three minutes. In other words, you had one more turnover than points you scored in the game. We call that uneffective. Next game, don't make crazy passes into the post. You're a big man, play like it.

The last gripe of this rant is our offense again. This again falls back to Bob. Do you know what 58 is? It's the number of possessions we had last night. Do you know why I'm pointing this out? Of course you do. It's because our team has become the greatest chameleon act in Division I basketball. Again, we proved we're incapable of playing our own pace or imposing our pace on the other team. We played down to Irvine's pace, which is about 62 possessions a game. The game before, when we played CSUF, we had 67 possessions, about 4 less than Fullerton averages. Against Riverside, we had 60 possessions, about 3 less than Riverside averages.

The point of this is that we don't know what kind of team we have because Bob Williams allows his opponent to dictate the pace. A crazy friend of mine once said, "everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face"(OK, Mike Tyson really isn't my friend). I don't know if the Gauchos have a plan, but they abandon it once the game starts. How about Bob surprises his opponent next game and forces his team to press and push the pace the entire game. If he does, I bet we get to the line a lot and shoot the three pretty well, and win. Wouldn't you believe it that that type of style plays into our two biggest strengths? Well, you should.

Have you figured out what the Mortal Kombat clip was? The point is that when we were up 10 points in the second half, we had the opportunity to step on Irvine's throat and finish them off. Unfortunately, we allowed them back in the game and lost. These guys need to get a killer instinct and take a lesson from the animal kingdom. When an animal sees/smells blood or weakness, they finish the other animal off because in their world, only the strongest survive.